member login

WebServices dot org

Todays Featured Content:

Service Oriented Virtualization

SOA and Virtualization are currently considered to be two separate disciplines, but they no longer need to be. SOA offers the enterprise the benefits of increased agility and cost efficiency in terms of application development, reuse, and making connections across heterogeneous applications and business partners

iTKO LISA Combines SOA Monitoring with Advanced Test Execution Capabilities

Native test interaction with leading system metrics dashboards and reporting environments provides improved control over performance and reliability.

For SOA, The Future of Quality is Federated

This paper will refer to government organizations as a case study on SOA Governance. However, architects and developers in the business computing arena can draw valuable lessons from the complex integration and quality challenges faced by federal agencies.

iTKO LISA 4 Release Revolutionizes SOA Quality with Virtualized Services and Business Process Testing Features

LISA's Evolution Mitigates IT Risk through SOA Testing, Integration Support and Policy Validation

iTKO, Inc., the leading provider of testing solutions for SOA (Service-Oriented Architecture) software, announced the availability of the new version of its flagship product suite, iTKO LISA 4 SOA Testing and Validation. LISA expands upon iTKO's delivery of the Three C's of testing - complete, collaborative and continuous - by adding key functionalities that mitigate the business risk of ever-increasing change and complexity in enterprise IT.

Featured Content provided by iTKO

Governance Tools -- Buyers Beware

John Michelsen
7th Mar 07:

While several vendors have a fairly common definition of a Governance, it’s entirely too inadequate to really suffice for a complete, robust, or end-all-be-all solution.

Enterprise software has a sometimes-sordid history of greatly over-promising and under-delivering. Some vendors I see in the governance space for SOA are repeating that bad history. That’s unfortunate given the tremendous promise in SOA and the tremendous capabilities that are possible for SOA governance.

No one vendor, even my own company iTKO, can provide 100% of what I would think is a robust governance solution today. It may never be that one vendor delivers 100% of a governance solution. Yet I’ve just been reading many vendors talk about their complete robust end-all-be-all governance solution for SOA.

While several vendors have a fairly common definition of a Governance, it’s entirely too inadequate to really suffice for a complete, robust, or end-all-be-all solution. In fact most Governance solutions right now in SOA are little more than bundling WSI tools and scanning XML with Xpath queries at run time for automation, and document repositories for non-automated Governance.

This is barely the beginning of what will create real governance. The outcome of a robust governance strategy is increased visibility, trust, and an infrastructure that has longevity compared to the many times we’ve attempted greater reuse and better IT alignment with the business.

One of the key areas that my company focuses on around governance is in the behavioral area and in making the definition of the word “policy” more rigorous than the meanings frequently used by the so-called governance tools also in our space.

At the end of the day, policy will need to be all of the kinds of things that you think of legislatures doing or any kind of rule-making body in our real world. Think about at the Federal level, very broad stroke kind of Policies. These are the things that some governance tools can do like “Thou shall use WS security for all of the access points from external sources coming on to our network. But there is also the State level, County level, City level and even Home Owners’ Association, if you think about it. You will never see a Federal Law about where I’m allowed or not allowed to place my US flag. But my Homeowners’ Association has all kinds of rules and restrictions about where I can and can’t place my flag.

So policy is really going to be where we, as an industry, focus Governance tools and within that focus, we’ve got to make sure that our definition of policy captures enough of the “what it takes” to get the value from Governance.

So the next time you are talking to a Governance tool vendor, let me suggest two things:

The first is to make them fully explain themselves about what their product does in terms of allowing the definition, modeling and enforcement of governance policy.

And, second, don’t just listen – make them show you.

We have a customer that spent 7 figures on a tool that was supposed to do a bunch of really interesting policy and governance work that’s barely doing much of that at all. You’ve got to see how the product works.

Governance buyers beware.

"

Reprinted from http://itko.blogspot.com

"

Trackback URL for this post: http://www.webservices.org/trackback/id/82918

Comments